The Disinformation Attacks Progressives Rarely See
Inside the 24/7 narrative network shaping political attitudes before the response even begins
The Attacks Progressives Rarely See
Most progressives think they know what the political messaging environment looks like.
They watch the news.
They follow political accounts.
They see the arguments unfolding on social media.
But there is a second political messaging universe operating online - one that many progressives rarely see.
Inside that universe, a constant stream of ads, influencers, and viral videos push a steady set of narratives about immigration, crime, schools, elections, and cultural change.
It runs 24 hours a day, across thousands of accounts and pages, reaching millions of people.
Because of how internet algorithms work, much of this messaging never crosses into progressive feeds.
Which means many of the most effective attacks shaping political attitudes are circulating for weeks or months before progressives even realize they exist.
And by the time the response begins, the narrative may already be embedded.
A 24/7 Narrative Network
One of the most important dynamics in today’s political information environment is something many progressives simply do not experience directly.
There is a 24/7 right-wing messaging network operating across the internet - a mix of paid ads, influencer content, partisan media, and organic posts that reinforce each other. It exists across Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, podcasts, newsletters, and short-form video platforms.
But because of how modern algorithms work, many progressives never see most of it.
Platforms increasingly show users content that aligns with their past behavior and networks. Progressives follow progressive accounts. Conservatives follow conservative ones. Algorithms optimize for engagement within those communities.
The result is parallel political information systems.
Inside the conservative ecosystem, messaging is constant, emotionally tuned, and culturally aligned with the audiences seeing it.
Outside that ecosystem, much of it is invisible.
And that invisibility creates a major strategic problem.
Unfortunately, there is no easy disinformation Radar…
A Message Environment Where We Don’t Inoculate
One of the core lessons from decades of research on disinformation — including recent work on inoculation theory - is that people become more resistant to manipulation when they are warned in advance about the tactics being used.
But when messaging ecosystems are separated by algorithms, that inoculation rarely happens.
In many cases:
Attack narratives circulate for weeks or months
They reach millions of people
They are refined through repeated testing
No pre-butting or message inoculation occurs
They become embedded in political identity and community conversations
Only after the narrative has fully spread do many progressives even realize it exists.
At that point, the debate often begins after the damage has already been done.
The Narratives Circulating Inside the Network:
I’m seeing a set of recurring themes showing up repeatedly in the right-wing persuasion ecosystem.
These narratives are not random. They are consistent storylines repeated across ads, influencers, and organizations.
Below are some of the most common ones circulating right now:
-Elections and Democracy Narratives
Election Fraud / “Stolen Elections”
Common claims include:
Mail voting allows fraud
Dead people voting
Ballot dumps or secret ballots
Claims elections are illegitimate
These messages often rely on conspiracy framing and urgency, encouraging people to “protect the vote” or “stop the steal.”
-Immigration and Crime Narratives
Immigration as an “Invasion”
Messaging frequently frames immigration as a national emergency.
Typical themes include:
“Open borders” claims
Immigrants causing crime
Immigrants taking jobs or benefits
These narratives often rely on dramatic border imagery and emotionally charged language like “surge,” “flood,” or “invasion.”
-Crime Panic
Another common narrative suggests American cities are collapsing because of liberal policies.
Typical claims include:
“Defund the police” caused crime waves
Criminals are being released
Cities are unsafe
These messages frequently rely on viral crime clips and isolated incidents presented as national trends.
-Schools and Cultural Conflict Narratives
“Parents vs Schools”
Schools are often framed as political battlegrounds.
Typical claims include:
Teachers pushing ideology
Schools hiding information from parents
Parents losing control of education
Messaging frequently uses emotional appeals about protecting children and slogans about “parents’ rights.”
-Transgender Panic
Another recurring narrative frames policies supporting transgender people as threats to women or children.
Typical claims include:
Concerns about sports participation
Locker room safety fears
Medical care framed as harm
These messages often rely heavily on protection-of-children framing and emotionally intense storytelling.
-Government and Elite Narratives
Government Tyranny
These messages frame government as becoming authoritarian.
Typical themes include:
Loss of freedom
Surveillance or weaponized government agencies
Comparisons to historical authoritarian regimes
These narratives frequently use constitutional language and warnings about liberty under threat.
-Anti-Elite Populism
Another common theme suggests powerful elites are secretly controlling society.
Targets often include:
media organizations
universities
global institutions
“Washington insiders”
These narratives often rely on phrases like “they don’t want you to know” or “the elites are lying.”
-Economic and Cultural Decline Narratives
Economic Collapse
Messaging frequently blames government policies for inflation or economic instability.
Typical claims include:
Government spending causing inflation
Energy policy destroying jobs
The middle class being crushed
These ads often rely on gas prices, grocery bills, and economic fear imagery. Seriously!
-America Is Falling Apart
Another broad narrative suggests American culture and values are collapsing.
Common themes include:
Traditional values disappearing
Moral decline
Calls to “restore American values”
These narratives often combine nostalgia, religion, and patriotism.
-Attacks on Institutions
Two additional narratives frequently appear across digital campaigns:
Anti-Union Messaging
Claims that unions are corrupt or harm workers and businesses.
Anti-Climate Messaging
Claims that climate policies destroy jobs or threaten energy independence.
These narratives often appear in issue-based campaigns targeting specific regions or industries.
These Are Our Observations - Not a Formal Study
To be clear: this is observational, not a formal academic study.
Much of what I’m describing comes from monitoring digital ad libraries, influencer networks, and messaging patterns appearing repeatedly across platforms.
But it would be extremely valuable to get more systematic metrics on this ecosystem.
For example:
How quickly do narratives spread across networks?
Which platforms amplify them most?
Which audiences see them first?
How long before counter-messaging appears?
If researchers or practitioners are tracking this data, I would be interested in seeing it.
The Strategic Problem: Speed
My main concern is not simply documenting narratives after they appear.
It is rapid discovery, rapid response, and rapid inoculation.
Three gaps appear repeatedly in the current system:
Rapid discovery
Narrative attacks often circulate widely before they are even detected by people outside the networks spreading them.
Rapid response
When responses do appear, they often arrive days or weeks after narratives are already embedded.
Rapid inoculation
The most effective response may not be fact-checking.
It may be warning audiences in advance about the manipulation tactics being used so people recognize them when they appear. Sometimes pre-butting can work.
A Network Problem
The right-wing persuasion system works partly because it operates as a coordinated narrative network.
Influencers, ads, media outlets, and grassroots communities often repeat the same themes at the same time.
Progressive communication, by contrast, often operates campaign-by-campaign rather than network-wide.
But in an algorithmic media environment, network effects determine narrative power.
Narratives spread through ecosystems.
So must the response.
What Narratives Are You Seeing?
This piece reflects what I and others have been observing across the digital ecosystem.
But I’m very aware this is observational, not comprehensive.
If you work in campaigns, digital monitoring, journalism, research, or platform analysis, I’m curious what you’re seeing:
What narrative attacks are appearing most often in your feeds or ad libraries?
Are there narratives spreading now that progressives are not noticing yet?
How quickly are they spreading across platforms?
Are there datasets or monitoring tools tracking narrative velocity?
If you have examples, screenshots, or metrics, please drop them in the comments.
One of the biggest challenges right now may simply be discovering narrative attacks early enough to inoculate audiences before they spread.
The faster we can map the ecosystem, the more effective the response can be.



Very good stuff. Something I wonder about is the fact that algorithms operate in an evidence-free environment. Therefore, RW narratives can and do become more and more divorced from reality. When the narratives are about things which real people have real and present experience with those narratives actually destroy Republican credibility.
For instance, in Tarrant County in the special election for the Texas House, the Republican, Leigh Wambganss, was (is) a MAGA activist. She instigated many local school controversies which have had an extremely detrimental effect on school quality. Of course, parent will fight anyone who messes with their child's education. However, she ignored something near and dear to voters: their home values.
The problem for her is in Texas, home values are the foundation for people's wealth. That is, home values matter a great deal and those values plummet in lockstep with the quality of the local school. As we know, wealth protection is a fundamental value of Republicans. So, Leigh's rhetoric was not matching what people saw with their own eyes and ears at school board meetings.
And down she went. Her Democratic opponent was normal, steady, credible and drew the contrast. Then, the Tarrant County Democrats had an impressive ground game and we got our voters to the polls. If we can take Republican's broad narratives and lay them side by side with people's real experiences, then the algorithmic narratives collapse. They don't just collapse, they destroy credibility. There are many such issues right now in which Republicans are demanding their voters deny what they are seeing with their own eyes and ears.
I have been thinking about this a lot. As a journalist who increasingly covers climate change and sustainability issues, it's always a challenge to reach those outside of your bubbles, and I'm noodling over how we apply the right's tactics to positive ends.